Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
English | Español (España)
Editorial
Revistas / Journals
Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología Metaverse Basic and Applied Research Data & Metadata Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias Community and Interculturality in Dialogue Seminars in Medical Writing and Education Health Leadership and Quality of Life Gamification and Augmented Reality Southern perspective / Perspectiva austral
Current Archives
About
About the Journal Submissions Editorial Team Privacy Statement Contact
×
English | Español (España)
Editorial

Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología Metaverse Basic and Applied Research Data & Metadata Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias Community and Interculturality in Dialogue Seminars in Medical Writing and Education Health Leadership and Quality of Life Gamification and Augmented Reality Southern perspective / Perspectiva austral
Current Archives

About the Journal Submissions Editorial Team Privacy Statement Contact
Original
Published: 2024-03-12
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/pa202422

The expert opinion in the administrative contentious jurisdiction in accordance with law 2080 of 2021

By
Carolina Arias Osorio ,
Carolina Arias Osorio

Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Administrativas y Contables. Pereira, Colombia

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Catalina Álvarez Londoño ,
Catalina Álvarez Londoño

Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Administrativas y Contables. Pereira, Colombia

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar

Abstract

One of the purposes of the Code of Administrative Procedure and Administrative Litigation was to enforce the protection of the rights and freedoms of the administered, which sought to have a codification less adjective and more substantial in which all aspects were regulated both in the Administration as in the Contentious Administrative Jurisdiction; However, the non-regulated, continues to be processed, by express authorization of the CPACA, through the General Code of the Process, being a relevant issue to clarify how this coding is applied to the processing of resources in the administrative trial, which is will make the hand of jurisprudence and doctrine.
It will be of manifest relevance to handle what has been stated by the Supreme Organ of the Contentious Administrative Jurisdiction between the years 2014 to 2016, in order to ratify through the jurisprudence the rules of application of the CGP in the processing of the resources.

Keywords:

Validity,
Transition,
Expert Opinion,
Referral Rules,
Burden of Proof,

How to Cite

1.
Arias Osorio C, Álvarez Londoño C. The expert opinion in the administrative contentious jurisdiction in accordance with law 2080 of 2021. Southern perspective / Perspectiva austral [Internet]. 2024 Mar. 12 [cited 2024 Jul. 27];2:22. Available from: https://pa.saludcyt.ar/index.php/pa/article/view/22

Copyright Notice

The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Vol. 2 (2024)
See full issue

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.